![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiWh90de4MDH2P4PCO4bGb8qUveEU1nnh6OhyUg9fDhbm2nFzO_wyC2LTbaTzIcIryIUrstwHkyL7j5-3VIeRRdw4l1mRV9tRDTUojEUhX-8OA4Q86jzxuCR5D0YmdNhMa_nWTHiq-6wU8N/s400/Monsoor2.jpg)
Petty Officer Monsoor’s actions are a perfect example of prosocial behavior. Prosocial behavior is defined as behavior that benefits others but has no obvious benefit to the individual that carries it out. Monsoor’s actions were certainly beneficial to the people around him, yet had no apparent benefit to Monsoor himself. In this case, not only was the behavior not beneficial to the person who carried it out, but it also carried with it enormous costs.
One could make the argument that Petty Officer Monsoor’s actions were motivated by pure altruism. While some believe that there is no such thing as true altruism, and that all actions are egoistic at their core, one would be hard-pressed to make that argument here. Monsoor did not dive on the grenade for his own ben
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgBxXRmuPKzMTtApxIEGfdbVQZ93PHivHE6pF11FK4dQQbrFWebOXNGTmLOOay-GreaFrpUMZtpjRSdy4sol2MVBFTmpZiD4ejuU3a2DSx718dpu0bJ3LZXiPqXNqKQO0fxjsp86qM77s2N/s320/Monsoor.jpg)
Batson would likely say that empathy was a key factor in Monsoor’s split-second decision. Batson’s empathy-altruism hypothesis maintains that the motivation behind some actions is truly altruistic, and that empathy is necessary for such an action to be carried out. On the battlefield, it could be assumed that each soldier has very high levels of empathy towards his fellow comrades. They have trained together and worked in unison, and are now united against a common enemy. Petty Officer Monsoor’s empathy likely played a role in triggering his truly altruistic actions. His sacrifice was an example of prosocial behavior in its rawest form.
Source: The New York Times, 4/9/08
No comments:
Post a Comment